Compare commits

..

1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude
441064b1bf feat: auto-update Dockerfile with current claude-code npm version
- Add GitHub workflow to automatically check for new claude-code versions daily
- Pin CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION to 2.0.55 (instead of 'latest') in Dockerfile and devcontainer.json
- Workflow creates PRs when new versions are available, ensuring Docker cache invalidation

Fixes #582
2025-11-30 04:13:14 +00:00
14 changed files with 113 additions and 843 deletions

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ FROM node:20
ARG TZ
ENV TZ="$TZ"
ARG CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION=latest
ARG CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION=2.0.55
# Install basic development tools and iptables/ipset
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
"dockerfile": "Dockerfile",
"args": {
"TZ": "${localEnv:TZ:America/Los_Angeles}",
"CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION": "latest",
"CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION": "2.0.55",
"GIT_DELTA_VERSION": "0.18.2",
"ZSH_IN_DOCKER_VERSION": "1.2.0"
}

View File

@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
name: "Remove Autoclose Label on Activity"
on:
issue_comment:
types: [created]
permissions:
issues: write
jobs:
remove-autoclose:
# Only run if the issue has the autoclose label
if: |
github.event.issue.state == 'open' &&
contains(github.event.issue.labels.*.name, 'autoclose') &&
github.event.comment.user.login != 'github-actions[bot]'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Remove autoclose label
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
console.log(`Removing autoclose label from issue #${context.issue.number} due to new comment from ${context.payload.comment.user.login}`);
try {
// Remove the autoclose label
await github.rest.issues.removeLabel({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
name: 'autoclose'
});
console.log(`Successfully removed autoclose label from issue #${context.issue.number}`);
} catch (error) {
// If the label was already removed or doesn't exist, that's fine
if (error.status === 404) {
console.log(`Autoclose label was already removed from issue #${context.issue.number}`);
} else {
throw error;
}
}

View File

@@ -1,157 +0,0 @@
name: "Manage Stale Issues"
on:
schedule:
# 2am Pacific = 9am UTC (10am UTC during DST)
- cron: "0 10 * * *"
workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
issues: write
concurrency:
group: stale-issue-manager
jobs:
manage-stale-issues:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Manage stale issues
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const oneMonthAgo = new Date();
oneMonthAgo.setDate(oneMonthAgo.getDate() - 30);
const twoMonthsAgo = new Date();
twoMonthsAgo.setDate(twoMonthsAgo.getDate() - 60);
const warningComment = `This issue has been inactive for 30 days. If the issue is still occurring, please comment to let us know. Otherwise, this issue will be automatically closed in 30 days for housekeeping purposes.`;
const closingComment = `This issue has been automatically closed due to 60 days of inactivity. If you're still experiencing this issue, please open a new issue with updated information.`;
let page = 1;
let hasMore = true;
let totalWarned = 0;
let totalClosed = 0;
let totalLabeled = 0;
while (hasMore) {
// Get open issues sorted by last updated (oldest first)
const { data: issues } = await github.rest.issues.listForRepo({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
state: 'open',
sort: 'updated',
direction: 'asc',
per_page: 100,
page: page
});
if (issues.length === 0) {
hasMore = false;
break;
}
for (const issue of issues) {
// Skip if already locked
if (issue.locked) continue;
// Skip pull requests
if (issue.pull_request) continue;
// Check if updated more recently than 30 days ago
const updatedAt = new Date(issue.updated_at);
if (updatedAt > oneMonthAgo) {
// Since issues are sorted by updated_at ascending,
// once we hit a recent issue, all remaining will be recent too
hasMore = false;
break;
}
// Check if issue has autoclose label
const hasAutocloseLabel = issue.labels.some(label =>
typeof label === 'object' && label.name === 'autoclose'
);
try {
// Get comments to check for existing warning
const { data: comments } = await github.rest.issues.listComments({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
per_page: 100
});
// Find the last comment from github-actions bot
const botComments = comments.filter(comment =>
comment.user && comment.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]' &&
comment.body && comment.body.includes('inactive for 30 days')
);
const lastBotComment = botComments[botComments.length - 1];
if (lastBotComment) {
// Check if the bot comment is older than 30 days (total 60 days of inactivity)
const botCommentDate = new Date(lastBotComment.created_at);
if (botCommentDate < oneMonthAgo) {
// Close the issue - it's been stale for 60+ days
console.log(`Closing issue #${issue.number} (stale for 60+ days): ${issue.title}`);
// Post closing comment
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
body: closingComment
});
// Close the issue
await github.rest.issues.update({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
state: 'closed',
state_reason: 'not_planned'
});
totalClosed++;
}
// If bot comment exists but is recent, issue already has warning
} else if (updatedAt < oneMonthAgo) {
// No bot warning yet, issue is 30+ days old
console.log(`Warning issue #${issue.number} (stale for 30+ days): ${issue.title}`);
// Post warning comment
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
body: warningComment
});
totalWarned++;
// Add autoclose label if not present
if (!hasAutocloseLabel) {
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
labels: ['autoclose']
});
totalLabeled++;
}
}
} catch (error) {
console.error(`Failed to process issue #${issue.number}: ${error.message}`);
}
}
page++;
}
console.log(`Summary:`);
console.log(`- Issues warned (30 days stale): ${totalWarned}`);
console.log(`- Issues labeled with autoclose: ${totalLabeled}`);
console.log(`- Issues closed (60 days stale): ${totalClosed}`);

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
name: Update DevContainer Claude Code Version
on:
schedule:
# Run daily at 00:00 UTC
- cron: '0 0 * * *'
workflow_dispatch: # Allow manual trigger
jobs:
update-version:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4
- name: Get latest npm version
id: npm-version
run: |
LATEST_VERSION=$(npm view @anthropic-ai/claude-code version)
echo "version=$LATEST_VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "Latest npm version: $LATEST_VERSION"
- name: Get current version from Dockerfile
id: current-version
run: |
CURRENT_VERSION=$(grep -oP 'ARG CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION=\K[^\s]+' .devcontainer/Dockerfile)
echo "version=$CURRENT_VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "Current version: $CURRENT_VERSION"
- name: Update version if changed
if: steps.npm-version.outputs.version != steps.current-version.outputs.version
run: |
NEW_VERSION="${{ steps.npm-version.outputs.version }}"
# Update Dockerfile
sed -i "s/ARG CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION=.*/ARG CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION=$NEW_VERSION/" .devcontainer/Dockerfile
# Update devcontainer.json
sed -i "s/\"CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION\": \".*\"/\"CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION\": \"$NEW_VERSION\"/" .devcontainer/devcontainer.json
echo "Updated version to $NEW_VERSION"
- name: Create Pull Request
if: steps.npm-version.outputs.version != steps.current-version.outputs.version
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v7
with:
commit-message: "chore: update devcontainer claude-code to v${{ steps.npm-version.outputs.version }}"
title: "chore: update devcontainer claude-code to v${{ steps.npm-version.outputs.version }}"
body: |
This PR automatically updates the claude-code version in the devcontainer configuration.
**Changes:**
- Updated `CLAUDE_CODE_VERSION` from `${{ steps.current-version.outputs.version }}` to `${{ steps.npm-version.outputs.version }}`
This ensures Docker cache is invalidated when rebuilding images, allowing users to get the latest claude-code version.
Related: #582
branch: chore/update-claude-code-version
delete-branch: true

View File

@@ -1,103 +1,5 @@
# Changelog
## 2.0.69
- Minor bugfixes
## 2.0.68
- Fixed IME (Input Method Editor) support for languages like Chinese, Japanese, and Korean by correctly positioning the composition window at the cursor
- Fixed a bug where disallowed MCP tools were visible to the model
- Fixed an issue where steering messages could be lost while a subagent is working
- Fixed Option+Arrow word navigation treating entire CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) text sequences as a single word instead of navigating by word boundaries
- Improved plan mode exit UX: show simplified yes/no dialog when exiting with empty or missing plan instead of throwing an error
- Add support for enterprise managed settings. Contact your Anthropic account team to enable this feature.
## 2.0.67
- Thinking mode is now enabled by default for Opus 4.5
- Thinking mode configuration has moved to /config
- Added search functionality to `/permissions` command with `/` keyboard shortcut for filtering rules by tool name
- Show reason why autoupdater is disabled in `/doctor`
- Fixed false "Another process is currently updating Claude" error when running `claude update` while another instance is already on the latest version
- Fixed MCP servers from `.mcp.json` being stuck in pending state when running in non-interactive mode (`-p` flag or piped input)
- Fixed scroll position resetting after deleting a permission rule in `/permissions`
- Fixed word deletion (opt+delete) and word navigation (opt+arrow) not working correctly with non-Latin text such as Cyrillic, Greek, Arabic, Hebrew, Thai, and Chinese
- Fixed `claude install --force` not bypassing stale lock files
- Fixed consecutive @~/ file references in CLAUDE.md being incorrectly parsed due to markdown strikethrough interference
- Windows: Fixed plugin MCP servers failing due to colons in log directory paths
## 2.0.65
- Added ability to switch models while writing a prompt using alt+p (linux, windows), option+p (macos).
- Added context window information to status line input
- Added `fileSuggestion` setting for custom `@` file search commands
- Added `CLAUDE_CODE_SHELL` environment variable to override automatic shell detection (useful when login shell differs from actual working shell)
- Fixed prompt not being saved to history when aborting a query with Escape
- Fixed Read tool image handling to identify format from bytes instead of file extension
## 2.0.64
- Made auto-compacting instant
- Agents and bash commands can run asynchronously and send messages to wake up the main agent
- /stats now provides users with interesting CC stats, such as favorite model, usage graph, usage streak
- Added named session support: use `/rename` to name sessions, `/resume <name>` in REPL or `claude --resume <name>` from the terminal to resume them
- Added support for .claude/rules/`. See https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory for details.
- Added image dimension metadata when images are resized, enabling accurate coordinate mappings for large images
- Fixed auto-loading .env when using native installer
- Fixed `--system-prompt` being ignored when using `--continue` or `--resume` flags
- Improved `/resume` screen with grouped forked sessions and keyboard shortcuts for preview (P) and rename (R)
- VSCode: Added copy-to-clipboard button on code blocks and bash tool inputs
- VSCode: Fixed extension not working on Windows ARM64 by falling back to x64 binary via emulation
- Bedrock: Improve efficiency of token counting
- Bedrock: Add support for `aws login` AWS Management Console credentials
- Unshipped AgentOutputTool and BashOutputTool, in favor of a new unified TaskOutputTool
## 2.0.62
- Added "(Recommended)" indicator for multiple-choice questions, with the recommended option moved to the top of the list
- Added `attribution` setting to customize commit and PR bylines (deprecates `includeCoAuthoredBy`)
- Fixed duplicate slash commands appearing when ~/.claude is symlinked to a project directory
- Fixed slash command selection not working when multiple commands share the same name
- Fixed an issue where skill files inside symlinked skill directories could become circular symlinks
- Fixed running versions getting removed because lock file incorrectly going stale
- Fixed IDE diff tab not closing when rejecting file changes
## 2.0.61
- Reverted VSCode support for multiple terminal clients due to responsiveness issues.
## 2.0.60
- Added background agent support. Agents run in the background while you work
- Added --disable-slash-commands CLI flag to disable all slash commands
- Added model name to "Co-Authored-By" commit messages
- Enabled "/mcp enable [server-name]" or "/mcp disable [server-name]" to quickly toggle all servers
- Updated Fetch to skip summarization for pre-approved websites
- VSCode: Added support for multiple terminal clients connecting to the IDE server simultaneously
## 2.0.59
- Added --agent CLI flag to override the agent setting for the current session
- Added `agent` setting to configure main thread with a specific agent's system prompt, tool restrictions, and model
- VS Code: Fixed .claude.json config file being read from incorrect location
## 2.0.58
- Pro users now have access to Opus 4.5 as part of their subscription!
- Fixed timer duration showing "11m 60s" instead of "12m 0s"
- Windows: Managed settings now prefer `C:\Program Files\ClaudeCode` if it exists. Support for `C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode` will be removed in a future version.
## 2.0.57
- Added feedback input when rejecting plans, allowing users to tell Claude what to change
- VSCode: Added streaming message support for real-time response display
## 2.0.56
- Added setting to enable/disable terminal progress bar (OSC 9;4)
- VSCode Extension: Added support for VS Code's secondary sidebar (VS Code 1.97+), allowing Claude Code to be displayed in the right sidebar while keeping the file explorer on the left. Requires setting sidebar as Preferred Location in the config.
## 2.0.55
- Fixed proxy DNS resolution being forced on by default. Now opt-in via `CLAUDE_CODE_PROXY_RESOLVES_HOSTS=true` environment variable
@@ -155,7 +57,7 @@
## 2.0.45
- Added support for Microsoft Foundry! See https://code.claude.com/docs/en/azure-ai-foundry
- Add support for Microsoft Foundry! See https://code.claude.com/docs/en/azure-ai-foundry
- Added `PermissionRequest` hook to automatically approve or deny tool permission requests with custom logic
- Send background tasks to Claude Code on the web by starting a message with `&`
@@ -278,7 +180,7 @@
## 2.0.25
- Removed legacy SDK entrypoint. Please migrate to @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk for future SDK updates: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agent-sdk/migration-guide
- Removed legacy SDK entrypoint. Please migrate to @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk for future SDK updates: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sdk/migration-guide
## 2.0.24
@@ -346,7 +248,7 @@
- Repository-level plugin configuration via `extraKnownMarketplaces` for team collaboration
- `/plugin validate` command for validating plugin structure and configuration
- Plugin announcement blog post at https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-code-plugins
- Plugin documentation available at https://code.claude.com/docs/en/plugins
- Plugin documentation available at https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/plugins
- Comprehensive error messages and diagnostics via `/doctor` command
- Avoid flickering in `/model` selector
- Improvements to `/help`
@@ -424,7 +326,7 @@
- Bash permission rules now support output redirections when matching (e.g., `Bash(python:*)` matches `python script.py > output.txt`)
- Fixed thinking mode triggering on negation phrases like "don't think"
- Fixed rendering performance degradation during token streaming
- Added SlashCommand tool, which enables Claude to invoke your slash commands. https://code.claude.com/docs/en/slash-commands#SlashCommand-tool
- Added SlashCommand tool, which enables Claude to invoke your slash commands. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/slash-commands#SlashCommand-tool
- Enhanced BashTool environment snapshot logging
- Fixed a bug where resuming a conversation in headless mode would sometimes enable thinking unnecessarily
- Migrated --debug logging to a file, to enable easy tailing & filtering
@@ -554,7 +456,7 @@
## 1.0.81
- Released output styles, including new built-in educational output styles "Explanatory" and "Learning". Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/output-styles
- Released output styles, including new built-in educational output styles "Explanatory" and "Learning". Docs: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/output-styles
- Agents: Fix custom agent loading when agent files are unparsable
## 1.0.80
@@ -759,7 +661,7 @@
## 1.0.38
- Released hooks. Special thanks to community input in https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/712. Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/hooks
- Released hooks. Special thanks to community input in https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/712. Docs: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/hooks
## 1.0.37

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ Learn more in the [official plugins documentation](https://docs.claude.com/en/do
| Name | Description | Contents |
|------|-------------|----------|
| [accept-with-feedback](./accept-with-feedback/) | Accept permission requests with feedback - provide guidance to Claude when approving operations | **Commands:** `/accept-feedback`, `/configure-feedback` - Set one-time or persistent feedback<br>**Hook:** PermissionRequest - Intercepts permissions to add user guidance |
| [agent-sdk-dev](./agent-sdk-dev/) | Development kit for working with the Claude Agent SDK | **Command:** `/new-sdk-app` - Interactive setup for new Agent SDK projects<br>**Agents:** `agent-sdk-verifier-py`, `agent-sdk-verifier-ts` - Validate SDK applications against best practices |
| [claude-opus-4-5-migration](./claude-opus-4-5-migration/) | Migrate code and prompts from Sonnet 4.x and Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5 | **Skill:** `claude-opus-4-5-migration` - Automated migration of model strings, beta headers, and prompt adjustments |
| [code-review](./code-review/) | Automated PR code review using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring to filter false positives | **Command:** `/code-review` - Automated PR review workflow<br>**Agents:** 5 parallel Sonnet agents for CLAUDE.md compliance, bug detection, historical context, PR history, and code comments |

View File

@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
{
"name": "accept-with-feedback",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Accept permission requests with feedback - provide guidance to Claude when approving operations",
"author": {
"name": "Anthropic",
"email": "support@anthropic.com"
}
}

View File

@@ -1,151 +0,0 @@
# Accept with Feedback
A Claude Code plugin that lets you approve operations while providing guidance to Claude. Instead of just accepting or rejecting permission requests, you can accept *with feedback* - approving the operation while giving Claude additional context or instructions.
## Why?
Sometimes you want to approve an operation but also want to guide Claude's behavior:
- "Yes, edit that file, but make sure to add error handling"
- "Okay to run those tests, but skip the slow integration tests"
- "Go ahead and commit, but use conventional commit format"
This plugin bridges the gap between simple approval and rejection-with-feedback.
## Installation
This plugin is included in the Claude Code repository. Enable it in your settings or use:
```bash
claude /plugin install accept-with-feedback
```
## Usage
### One-time feedback
Use the `/accept-feedback` command to queue feedback for the next permission request:
```
/accept-feedback Make sure to preserve backwards compatibility
```
When Claude next asks for permission (e.g., to edit a file), the operation will be automatically approved and Claude will receive your guidance as a system message.
### Persistent feedback rules
Create rules that automatically provide feedback for certain types of operations. Add configuration to `.claude/accept-feedback.json`:
```json
{
"rules": [
{
"matcher": "Edit|Write",
"conditions": {
"file_path": ".py"
},
"feedback": "Follow PEP 8 style and add type hints to all functions."
},
{
"matcher": "Bash",
"conditions": {
"command": "npm"
},
"feedback": "Use --legacy-peer-deps if you encounter peer dependency issues."
}
]
}
```
Use `/configure-feedback` for an interactive configuration experience.
## Configuration
### Rule properties
| Property | Description | Example |
|----------|-------------|---------|
| `matcher` | Tool name pattern | `"Edit"`, `"Write\|Edit"`, `"*"` |
| `conditions` | Optional filters on tool input | `{"file_path": ".ts"}` |
| `feedback` | Guidance message for Claude | `"Add JSDoc comments"` |
### Configuration locations
- **User-level**: `~/.claude/accept-feedback.json`
- **Project-level**: `.claude/accept-feedback.json` (takes precedence)
## Commands
| Command | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| `/accept-feedback <message>` | Queue feedback for the next permission request |
| `/configure-feedback` | Interactive configuration of persistent rules |
## How it works
1. The plugin uses a `PermissionRequest` hook to intercept permission requests
2. When a permission request occurs:
- If there's pending feedback (from `/accept-feedback`), approve with that feedback
- If a configured rule matches, approve with the rule's feedback
- Otherwise, let the normal permission flow proceed
3. Feedback is sent to Claude as a system message, providing guidance for the operation
## Examples
### Example 1: One-time guidance
```
You: /accept-feedback Please add comprehensive error handling
Claude: I'll edit src/api.ts to add the new endpoint...
[Permission automatically approved with your feedback]
Claude: I've added the endpoint with try-catch blocks and proper error responses...
```
### Example 2: Persistent Python style rules
`.claude/accept-feedback.json`:
```json
{
"rules": [
{
"matcher": "Edit|Write",
"conditions": {
"file_path": ".py"
},
"feedback": "Use Google-style docstrings and add type hints to all function signatures."
}
]
}
```
Every time Claude edits a Python file, it receives this style guidance.
### Example 3: Git workflow rules
```json
{
"rules": [
{
"matcher": "Bash",
"conditions": {
"command": "git commit"
},
"feedback": "Use conventional commit format: type(scope): description"
}
]
}
```
## Tips
- Use specific matchers to avoid unnecessary approvals
- Conditions use substring matching - `".py"` matches any path containing `.py`
- Combine with other permission management for a comprehensive workflow
- Feedback is visible in the conversation, so Claude can reference it
## Related
- Rejecting with feedback: Built into Claude Code's plan rejection flow
- Permission hooks: See the [hook development guide](../plugin-dev/skills/hook-development/SKILL.md)

View File

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
---
description: Set feedback to provide when accepting the next permission request
argument_name: feedback
---
# Accept with Feedback
You are helping the user set feedback that will be automatically provided to Claude when the next permission request is approved.
## What the user wants
The user wants to approve an upcoming operation but also provide guidance or feedback to Claude. This feedback will:
1. Automatically approve the next permission request
2. Send the feedback message to Claude as guidance
## Instructions
1. Parse the user's feedback from the argument: `$ARGUMENTS`
2. If feedback was provided, save it for the next permission request:
- Create/update the file `~/.claude/pending-accept-feedback.json`
- Store the feedback with the current session ID
3. Confirm to the user that their feedback has been queued
## Saving the feedback
Use this Python code to save the pending feedback:
```python
import json
import os
from pathlib import Path
feedback = """$ARGUMENTS"""
session_id = os.environ.get("CLAUDE_SESSION_ID", "default")
pending_file = Path.home() / ".claude" / "pending-accept-feedback.json"
pending_file.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
try:
existing = json.loads(pending_file.read_text()) if pending_file.exists() else {}
except:
existing = {}
existing[session_id] = {
"message": feedback,
"one_time": True
}
pending_file.write_text(json.dumps(existing, indent=2))
print(f"Feedback queued for next permission request.")
```
## Example usage
User runs: `/accept-feedback Make sure to add error handling`
Then when Claude asks for permission to edit a file, the operation is automatically approved and Claude receives the guidance: "Make sure to add error handling"
## Response
After saving, confirm: "Your feedback has been queued. The next permission request will be automatically approved, and Claude will receive your guidance."

View File

@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
---
description: Configure persistent feedback rules for accept-with-feedback
---
# Configure Accept-with-Feedback Rules
You are helping the user configure persistent feedback rules that automatically provide guidance to Claude when certain operations are approved.
## Configuration file location
Rules are stored in `.claude/accept-feedback.json` in either:
- User's home directory (`~/.claude/accept-feedback.json`) for global rules
- Project directory (`.claude/accept-feedback.json`) for project-specific rules
Project rules take precedence over user rules.
## Configuration format
```json
{
"rules": [
{
"matcher": "Edit|Write",
"conditions": {
"file_path": ".py"
},
"feedback": "Ensure all Python code follows PEP 8 style guidelines and includes type hints."
},
{
"matcher": "Bash",
"conditions": {
"command": "git"
},
"feedback": "Use conventional commit format for commit messages."
},
{
"matcher": "*",
"feedback": "Please explain your reasoning before making changes."
}
]
}
```
## Rule properties
- **matcher**: Tool name pattern (e.g., "Edit", "Write|Edit", "*" for all)
- **conditions**: Optional key-value pairs to match against tool input
- **feedback**: The guidance message to send to Claude when this rule matches
## Instructions
1. Ask the user what kind of feedback rules they want to configure
2. Help them create appropriate rules based on their needs
3. Save the configuration to the appropriate location
## Common use cases
1. **Code style guidance**: Provide style guidelines when editing specific file types
2. **Git workflow**: Add commit message format requirements for git operations
3. **Safety reminders**: Add warnings when working with sensitive files
4. **Project conventions**: Enforce project-specific patterns and practices
## Example interaction
User: "I want to always remind Claude to add tests when editing Python files"
You would create:
```json
{
"rules": [
{
"matcher": "Edit|Write",
"conditions": {
"file_path": ".py"
},
"feedback": "Remember to add or update tests for any code changes."
}
]
}
```

View File

@@ -1,152 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Accept with Feedback Hook for Claude Code
This hook intercepts permission requests and allows users to provide feedback
when accepting operations. The feedback is passed to Claude as a system message,
giving users a way to provide guidance while still approving the operation.
Usage:
1. Set pending feedback: /accept-feedback "your guidance here"
2. When a permission prompt appears, if pending feedback exists:
- The operation is automatically approved
- Your feedback is sent to Claude as guidance
3. Or configure always-on feedback rules in .claude/accept-feedback.json
"""
import json
import os
import sys
from datetime import datetime
from pathlib import Path
def get_config_paths():
"""Get paths for config and state files."""
claude_dir = Path.home() / ".claude"
project_dir = Path(os.environ.get("CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR", "."))
return {
"user_config": claude_dir / "accept-feedback.json",
"project_config": project_dir / ".claude" / "accept-feedback.json",
"pending_feedback": claude_dir / "pending-accept-feedback.json",
}
def load_json_file(path):
"""Load JSON from file, return empty dict if not found."""
try:
if path.exists():
with open(path, "r") as f:
return json.load(f)
except (json.JSONDecodeError, IOError):
pass
return {}
def get_pending_feedback(session_id):
"""Get pending feedback for this session and clear it."""
paths = get_config_paths()
pending_file = paths["pending_feedback"]
pending = load_json_file(pending_file)
# Check for session-specific pending feedback
if session_id in pending:
feedback = pending[session_id]
# Clear the pending feedback after use
del pending[session_id]
try:
if pending:
with open(pending_file, "w") as f:
json.dump(pending, f)
else:
pending_file.unlink(missing_ok=True)
except IOError:
pass
return feedback.get("message"), feedback.get("one_time", True)
return None, True
def get_configured_feedback(tool_name, tool_input):
"""Get feedback configured for this tool type."""
paths = get_config_paths()
# Load both user and project configs
user_config = load_json_file(paths["user_config"])
project_config = load_json_file(paths["project_config"])
# Project config takes precedence
config = {**user_config, **project_config}
rules = config.get("rules", [])
for rule in rules:
# Check if rule matches this tool
matcher = rule.get("matcher", "*")
if matcher == "*" or tool_name in matcher.split("|"):
# Check conditions if specified
conditions = rule.get("conditions", {})
matches = True
for key, pattern in conditions.items():
value = str(tool_input.get(key, ""))
if pattern not in value:
matches = False
break
if matches:
return rule.get("feedback")
return None
def main():
"""Main hook function."""
# Read input from stdin
try:
raw_input = sys.stdin.read()
input_data = json.loads(raw_input)
except json.JSONDecodeError:
# Can't parse input, don't interfere
sys.exit(0)
session_id = input_data.get("session_id", "default")
tool_name = input_data.get("tool_name", "")
tool_input = input_data.get("tool_input", {})
# Check for pending feedback first (from /accept-feedback command)
pending_message, _ = get_pending_feedback(session_id)
if pending_message:
# We have pending feedback - approve with the feedback as system message
result = {
"hookSpecificOutput": {
"permissionDecision": "allow"
},
"systemMessage": f"[User Feedback on Approval]: {pending_message}"
}
print(json.dumps(result))
sys.exit(0)
# Check for configured feedback rules
configured_feedback = get_configured_feedback(tool_name, tool_input)
if configured_feedback:
# We have configured feedback for this tool type
result = {
"hookSpecificOutput": {
"permissionDecision": "allow"
},
"systemMessage": f"[User Guidance]: {configured_feedback}"
}
print(json.dumps(result))
sys.exit(0)
# No feedback configured - don't interfere with the normal permission flow
sys.exit(0)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()

View File

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
{
"description": "Accept with feedback - allows users to provide guidance when approving tool permissions",
"hooks": {
"PermissionRequest": [
{
"matcher": "*",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/accept_with_feedback.py",
"timeout": 300
}
]
}
]
}
}

View File

@@ -1,91 +1,65 @@
---
allowed-tools: Bash(gh issue view:*), Bash(gh search:*), Bash(gh issue list:*), Bash(gh pr comment:*), Bash(gh pr diff:*), Bash(gh pr view:*), Bash(gh pr list:*)
description: Code review a pull request
disable-model-invocation: false
---
Provide a code review for the given pull request.
To do this, follow these steps precisely:
1. Launch a haiku agent to check if any of the following are true:
- The pull request is closed
- The pull request is a draft
- The pull request does not need code review (e.g. automated PR, trivial change that is obviously correct)
- You have already submitted a code review on this pull request
If any condition is true, stop and do not proceed.
Note: Still review Claude generated PR's.
2. Launch a haiku agent to return a list of file paths (not their contents) for all relevant CLAUDE.md files including:
- The root CLAUDE.md file, if it exists
- Any CLAUDE.md files in directories containing files modified by the pull request
3. Launch a sonnet agent to view the pull request and return a summary of the changes
4. Launch 4 agents in parallel to independently review the changes. Each agent should return the list of issues, where each issue includes a description and the reason it was flagged (e.g. "CLAUDE.md adherence", "bug"). The agents should do the following:
Agents 1 + 2: CLAUDE.md compliance sonnet agents
Audit changes for CLAUDE.md compliance in parallel. Note: When evaluating CLAUDE.md compliance for a file, you should only consider CLAUDE.md files that share a file path with the file or parents.
Agent 3: Opus bug agent (parallel subagent with agent 4)
Scan for obvious bugs. Focus only on the diff itself without reading extra context. Flag only significant bugs; ignore nitpicks and likely false positives. Do not flag issues that you cannot validate without looking at context outside of the git diff.
Agent 4: Opus bug agent (parallel subagent with agent 3)
Look for problems that exist in the introduced code. This could be security issues, incorrect logic, etc. Only look for issues that fall within the changed code.
**CRITICAL: We only want HIGH SIGNAL issues.** This means:
- Objective bugs that will cause incorrect behavior at runtime
- Clear, unambiguous CLAUDE.md violations where you can quote the exact rule being broken
We do NOT want:
- Subjective concerns or "suggestions"
- Style preferences not explicitly required by CLAUDE.md
- Potential issues that "might" be problems
- Anything requiring interpretation or judgment calls
If you are not certain an issue is real, do not flag it. False positives erode trust and waste reviewer time.
In addition to the above, each subagent should be told the PR title and description. This will help provide context regarding the author's intent.
5. For each issue found in the previous step by agents 3 and 4, launch parallel subagents to validate the issue. These subagents should get the PR title and description along with a description of the issue. The agent's job is to review the issue to validate that the stated issue is truly an issue with high confidence. For example, if an issue such as "variable is not defined" was flagged, the subagent's job would be to validate that is actually true in the code. Another example would be CLAUDE.md issues. The agent should validate that the CLAUDE.md rule that was violated is scoped for this file and is actually violated. Use Opus subagents for bugs and logic issues, and sonnet agents for CLAUDE.md violations.
6. Filter out any issues that were not validated in step 5. This step will give us our list of high signal issues for our review.
7. Finally, comment on the pull request.
When writing your comment, follow these guidelines:
1. Use a Haiku agent to check if the pull request (a) is closed, (b) is a draft, (c) does not need a code review (eg. because it is an automated pull request, or is very simple and obviously ok), or (d) already has a code review from you from earlier. If so, do not proceed.
2. Use another Haiku agent to give you a list of file paths to (but not the contents of) any relevant CLAUDE.md files from the codebase: the root CLAUDE.md file (if one exists), as well as any CLAUDE.md files in the directories whose files the pull request modified
3. Use a Haiku agent to view the pull request, and ask the agent to return a summary of the change
4. Then, launch 5 parallel Sonnet agents to independently code review the change. The agents should do the following, then return a list of issues and the reason each issue was flagged (eg. CLAUDE.md adherence, bug, historical git context, etc.):
a. Agent #1: Audit the changes to make sure they compily with the CLAUDE.md. Note that CLAUDE.md is guidance for Claude as it writes code, so not all instructions will be applicable during code review.
b. Agent #2: Read the file changes in the pull request, then do a shallow scan for obvious bugs. Avoid reading extra context beyond the changes, focusing just on the changes themselves. Focus on large bugs, and avoid small issues and nitpicks. Ignore likely false positives.
c. Agent #3: Read the git blame and history of the code modified, to identify any bugs in light of that historical context
d. Agent #4: Read previous pull requests that touched these files, and check for any comments on those pull requests that may also apply to the current pull request.
e. Agent #5: Read code comments in the modified files, and make sure the changes in the pull request comply with any guidance in the comments.
5. For each issue found in #4, launch a parallel Haiku agent that takes the PR, issue description, and list of CLAUDE.md files (from step 2), and returns a score to indicate the agent's level of confidence for whether the issue is real or false positive. To do that, the agent should score each issue on a scale from 0-100, indicating its level of confidence. For issues that were flagged due to CLAUDE.md instructions, the agent should double check that the CLAUDE.md actually calls out that issue specifically. The scale is (give this rubric to the agent verbatim):
a. 0: Not confident at all. This is a false positive that doesn't stand up to light scrutiny, or is a pre-existing issue.
b. 25: Somewhat confident. This might be a real issue, but may also be a false positive. The agent wasn't able to verify that it's a real issue. If the issue is stylistic, it is one that was not explicitly called out in the relevant CLAUDE.md.
c. 50: Moderately confident. The agent was able to verify this is a real issue, but it might be a nitpick or not happen very often in practice. Relative to the rest of the PR, it's not very important.
d. 75: Highly confident. The agent double checked the issue, and verified that it is very likely it is a real issue that will be hit in practice. The existing approach in the PR is insufficient. The issue is very important and will directly impact the code's functionality, or it is an issue that is directly mentioned in the relevant CLAUDE.md.
e. 100: Absolutely certain. The agent double checked the issue, and confirmed that it is definitely a real issue, that will happen frequently in practice. The evidence directly confirms this.
6. Filter out any issues with a score less than 80. If there are no issues that meet this criteria, do not proceed.
7. Use a Haiku agent to repeat the eligibility check from #1, to make sure that the pull request is still eligible for code review.
8. Finally, use the gh bash command to comment back on the pull request with the result. When writing your comment, keep in mind to:
a. Keep your output brief
b. Avoid emojis
c. Link and cite relevant code, files, and URLs for each issue
d. When citing CLAUDE.md violations, you MUST quote the exact text from CLAUDE.md that is being violated (e.g., CLAUDE.md says: "Use snake_case for variable names")
c. Link and cite relevant code, files, and URLs
Use this list when evaluating issues in Steps 4 and 5 (these are false positives, do NOT flag):
Examples of false positives, for steps 4 and 5:
- Pre-existing issues
- Something that appears to be a bug but is actually correct
- Pedantic nitpicks that a senior engineer would not flag
- Issues that a linter will catch (do not run the linter to verify)
- General code quality concerns (e.g., lack of test coverage, general security issues) unless explicitly required in CLAUDE.md
- Issues mentioned in CLAUDE.md but explicitly silenced in the code (e.g., via a lint ignore comment)
- Something that looks like a bug but is not actually a bug
- Pedantic nitpicks that a senior engineer wouldn't call out
- Issues that a linter, typechecker, or compiler would catch (eg. missing or incorrect imports, type errors, broken tests, formatting issues, pedantic style issues like newlines). No need to run these build steps yourself -- it is safe to assume that they will be run separately as part of CI.
- General code quality issues (eg. lack of test coverage, general security issues, poor documentation), unless explicitly required in CLAUDE.md
- Issues that are called out in CLAUDE.md, but explicitly silenced in the code (eg. due to a lint ignore comment)
- Changes in functionality that are likely intentional or are directly related to the broader change
- Real issues, but on lines that the user did not modify in their pull request
Notes:
- Use gh CLI to interact with GitHub (e.g., fetch pull requests, create comments). Do not use web fetch.
- Create a todo list before starting.
- You must cite and link each issue (e.g., if referring to a CLAUDE.md, include a link to it).
- Do not check build signal or attempt to build or typecheck the app. These will run separately, and are not relevant to your code review.
- Use `gh` to interact with Github (eg. to fetch a pull request, or to create inline comments), rather than web fetch
- Make a todo list first
- You must cite and link each bug (eg. if referring to a CLAUDE.md, you must link it)
- For your final comment, follow the following format precisely (assuming for this example that you found 3 issues):
---
## Code review
### Code review
Found 3 issues:
1. <brief description of bug> (CLAUDE.md says: "<exact quote from CLAUDE.md>")
1. <brief description of bug> (CLAUDE.md says "<...>")
<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context, eg. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/1d54823877c4de72b2316a64032a54afc404e619/README.md#L13-L17>
<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context, note that you MUST provide the full sha and not use bash here, eg. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/1d54823877c4de72b2316a64032a54afc404e619/README.md#L13-L17>
2. <brief description of bug> (some/other/CLAUDE.md says: "<exact quote from CLAUDE.md>")
2. <brief description of bug> (some/other/CLAUDE.md says "<...>")
<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context>
@@ -93,19 +67,23 @@ Found 3 issues:
<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context>
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
<sub>- If this code review was useful, please react with 👍. Otherwise, react with 👎.</sub>
---
- Or, if you found no issues:
---
## Auto code review
### Code review
No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance.
---
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
- When linking to code, follow the following format precisely, otherwise the Markdown preview won't render correctly: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/c21d3c10bc8e898b7ac1a2d745bdc9bc4e423afe/package.json#L10-L15
- When linking to code, follow the following format precisely, otherwise the Markdown preview won't render correctly: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-cli-internal/blob/c21d3c10bc8e898b7ac1a2d745bdc9bc4e423afe/package.json#L10-L15
- Requires full git sha
- You must provide the full sha. Commands like `https://github.com/owner/repo/blob/$(git rev-parse HEAD)/foo/bar` will not work, since your comment will be directly rendered in Markdown.
- Repo name must match the repo you're code reviewing