chore: Update CHANGELOG.md

Improve code review inline comments

.claude-plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -15,14 +15,25 @@
       "category": "development"
     },
     {
-      "name": "pr-review-toolkit",
-      "description": "Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification",
+      "name": "claude-opus-4-5-migration",
+      "description": "Migrate your code and prompts from Sonnet 4.x and Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5.",
       "version": "1.0.0",
       "author": {
-        "name": "Anthropic",
-        "email": "support@anthropic.com"
+        "name": "William Hu",
+        "email": "whu@anthropic.com"
       },
-      "source": "./plugins/pr-review-toolkit",
+      "source": "./plugins/claude-opus-4-5-migration",
+      "category": "development"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "code-review",
+      "description": "Automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring to filter false positives",
+      "version": "1.0.0",
+      "author": {
+        "name": "Boris Cherny",
+        "email": "boris@anthropic.com"
+      },
+      "source": "./plugins/code-review",
       "category": "productivity"
     },
     {
@@ -36,39 +47,6 @@
       "source": "./plugins/commit-commands",
       "category": "productivity"
     },
-    {
-      "name": "feature-dev",
-      "description": "Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review",
-      "version": "1.0.0",
-      "author": {
-        "name": "Siddharth Bidasaria",
-        "email": "sbidasaria@anthropic.com"
-      },
-      "source": "./plugins/feature-dev",
-      "category": "development"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "security-guidance",
-      "description": "Security reminder hook that warns about potential security issues when editing files, including command injection, XSS, and unsafe code patterns",
-      "version": "1.0.0",
-      "author": {
-        "name": "David Dworken",
-        "email": "dworken@anthropic.com"
-      },
-      "source": "./plugins/security-guidance",
-      "category": "security"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "code-review",
-      "description": "Automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring to filter false positives",
-      "version": "1.0.0",
-      "author": {
-        "name": "Boris Cherny",
-        "email": "boris@anthropic.com"
-      },
-      "source": "./plugins/code-review",
-      "category": "productivity"
-    },
     {
       "name": "explanatory-output-style",
       "description": "Adds educational insights about implementation choices and codebase patterns (mimics the deprecated Explanatory output style)",
@@ -81,15 +59,15 @@
       "category": "learning"
     },
     {
-      "name": "learning-output-style",
-      "description": "Interactive learning mode that requests meaningful code contributions at decision points (mimics the unshipped Learning output style)",
+      "name": "feature-dev",
+      "description": "Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review",
       "version": "1.0.0",
       "author": {
-        "name": "Boris Cherny",
-        "email": "boris@anthropic.com"
+        "name": "Siddharth Bidasaria",
+        "email": "sbidasaria@anthropic.com"
       },
-      "source": "./plugins/learning-output-style",
-      "category": "learning"
+      "source": "./plugins/feature-dev",
+      "category": "development"
     },
     {
       "name": "frontend-design",
@@ -102,17 +80,6 @@
       "source": "./plugins/frontend-design",
       "category": "development"
     },
-    {
-      "name": "ralph-wiggum",
-      "description": "Interactive self-referential AI loops for iterative development. Claude works on the same task repeatedly, seeing its previous work, until completion.",
-      "version": "1.0.0",
-      "author": {
-        "name": "Daisy Hollman",
-        "email": "daisy@anthropic.com"
-      },
-      "source": "./plugins/ralph-wiggum",
-      "category": "development"
-    },
     {
       "name": "hookify",
       "description": "Easily create custom hooks to prevent unwanted behaviors by analyzing conversation patterns or from explicit instructions. Define rules via simple markdown files.",
@@ -124,6 +91,17 @@
       "source": "./plugins/hookify",
       "category": "productivity"
     },
+    {
+      "name": "learning-output-style",
+      "description": "Interactive learning mode that requests meaningful code contributions at decision points (mimics the unshipped Learning output style)",
+      "version": "1.0.0",
+      "author": {
+        "name": "Boris Cherny",
+        "email": "boris@anthropic.com"
+      },
+      "source": "./plugins/learning-output-style",
+      "category": "learning"
+    },
     {
       "name": "plugin-dev",
       "description": "Comprehensive toolkit for developing Claude Code plugins. Includes 7 expert skills covering hooks, MCP integration, commands, agents, and best practices. AI-assisted plugin creation and validation.",
@@ -136,15 +114,37 @@
       "category": "development"
     },
     {
-      "name": "claude-opus-4-5-migration",
-      "description": "Migrate your code and prompts from Sonnet 4.x and Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5.",
+      "name": "pr-review-toolkit",
+      "description": "Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification",
       "version": "1.0.0",
       "author": {
-        "name": "William Hu",
-        "email": "whu@anthropic.com"
+        "name": "Anthropic",
+        "email": "support@anthropic.com"
       },
-      "source": "./plugins/claude-opus-4-5-migration",
+      "source": "./plugins/pr-review-toolkit",
+      "category": "productivity"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "ralph-wiggum",
+      "description": "Interactive self-referential AI loops for iterative development. Claude works on the same task repeatedly, seeing its previous work, until completion.",
+      "version": "1.0.0",
+      "author": {
+        "name": "Daisy Hollman",
+        "email": "daisy@anthropic.com"
+      },
+      "source": "./plugins/ralph-wiggum",
       "category": "development"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "security-guidance",
+      "description": "Security reminder hook that warns about potential security issues when editing files, including command injection, XSS, and unsafe code patterns",
+      "version": "1.0.0",
+      "author": {
+        "name": "David Dworken",
+        "email": "dworken@anthropic.com"
+      },
+      "source": "./plugins/security-guidance",
+      "category": "security"
     }
   ]
 }

.github/workflows/remove-autoclose-label.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+name: "Remove Autoclose Label on Activity"
+
+on:
+  issue_comment:
+    types: [created]
+
+permissions:
+  issues: write
+
+jobs:
+  remove-autoclose:
+    # Only run if the issue has the autoclose label
+    if: |
+      github.event.issue.state == 'open' &&
+      contains(github.event.issue.labels.*.name, 'autoclose') &&
+      github.event.comment.user.login != 'github-actions[bot]'
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Remove autoclose label
+        uses: actions/github-script@v7
+        with:
+          script: |
+            console.log(`Removing autoclose label from issue #${context.issue.number} due to new comment from ${context.payload.comment.user.login}`);
+            
+            try {
+              // Remove the autoclose label
+              await github.rest.issues.removeLabel({
+                owner: context.repo.owner,
+                repo: context.repo.repo,
+                issue_number: context.issue.number,
+                name: 'autoclose'
+              });
+              
+              console.log(`Successfully removed autoclose label from issue #${context.issue.number}`);
+            } catch (error) {
+              // If the label was already removed or doesn't exist, that's fine
+              if (error.status === 404) {
+                console.log(`Autoclose label was already removed from issue #${context.issue.number}`);
+              } else {
+                throw error;
+              }
+            }

.github/workflows/stale-issue-manager.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+name: "Manage Stale Issues"
+
+on:
+  schedule:
+    # 2am Pacific = 9am UTC (10am UTC during DST)
+    - cron: "0 10 * * *"
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+permissions:
+  issues: write
+
+concurrency:
+  group: stale-issue-manager
+
+jobs:
+  manage-stale-issues:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Manage stale issues
+        uses: actions/github-script@v7
+        with:
+          script: |
+            const oneMonthAgo = new Date();
+            oneMonthAgo.setDate(oneMonthAgo.getDate() - 30);
+
+            const twoMonthsAgo = new Date();
+            twoMonthsAgo.setDate(twoMonthsAgo.getDate() - 60);
+
+            const warningComment = `This issue has been inactive for 30 days. If the issue is still occurring, please comment to let us know. Otherwise, this issue will be automatically closed in 30 days for housekeeping purposes.`;
+
+            const closingComment = `This issue has been automatically closed due to 60 days of inactivity. If you're still experiencing this issue, please open a new issue with updated information.`;
+
+            let page = 1;
+            let hasMore = true;
+            let totalWarned = 0;
+            let totalClosed = 0;
+            let totalLabeled = 0;
+
+            while (hasMore) {
+              // Get open issues sorted by last updated (oldest first)
+              const { data: issues } = await github.rest.issues.listForRepo({
+                owner: context.repo.owner,
+                repo: context.repo.repo,
+                state: 'open',
+                sort: 'updated',
+                direction: 'asc',
+                per_page: 100,
+                page: page
+              });
+              
+              if (issues.length === 0) {
+                hasMore = false;
+                break;
+              }
+              
+              for (const issue of issues) {
+                // Skip if already locked
+                if (issue.locked) continue;
+                
+                // Skip pull requests
+                if (issue.pull_request) continue;
+                
+                // Check if updated more recently than 30 days ago
+                const updatedAt = new Date(issue.updated_at);
+                if (updatedAt > oneMonthAgo) {
+                  // Since issues are sorted by updated_at ascending, 
+                  // once we hit a recent issue, all remaining will be recent too
+                  hasMore = false;
+                  break;
+                }
+                
+                // Check if issue has autoclose label
+                const hasAutocloseLabel = issue.labels.some(label => 
+                  typeof label === 'object' && label.name === 'autoclose'
+                );
+                
+                try {
+                  // Get comments to check for existing warning
+                  const { data: comments } = await github.rest.issues.listComments({
+                    owner: context.repo.owner,
+                    repo: context.repo.repo,
+                    issue_number: issue.number,
+                    per_page: 100
+                  });
+                  
+                  // Find the last comment from github-actions bot
+                  const botComments = comments.filter(comment => 
+                    comment.user && comment.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]' &&
+                    comment.body && comment.body.includes('inactive for 30 days')
+                  );
+                  
+                  const lastBotComment = botComments[botComments.length - 1];
+                  
+                  if (lastBotComment) {
+                    // Check if the bot comment is older than 30 days (total 60 days of inactivity)
+                    const botCommentDate = new Date(lastBotComment.created_at);
+                    if (botCommentDate < oneMonthAgo) {
+                      // Close the issue - it's been stale for 60+ days
+                      console.log(`Closing issue #${issue.number} (stale for 60+ days): ${issue.title}`);
+                      
+                      // Post closing comment
+                      await github.rest.issues.createComment({
+                        owner: context.repo.owner,
+                        repo: context.repo.repo,
+                        issue_number: issue.number,
+                        body: closingComment
+                      });
+                      
+                      // Close the issue
+                      await github.rest.issues.update({
+                        owner: context.repo.owner,
+                        repo: context.repo.repo,
+                        issue_number: issue.number,
+                        state: 'closed',
+                        state_reason: 'not_planned'
+                      });
+                      
+                      totalClosed++;
+                    }
+                    // If bot comment exists but is recent, issue already has warning
+                  } else if (updatedAt < oneMonthAgo) {
+                    // No bot warning yet, issue is 30+ days old
+                    console.log(`Warning issue #${issue.number} (stale for 30+ days): ${issue.title}`);
+                    
+                    // Post warning comment
+                    await github.rest.issues.createComment({
+                      owner: context.repo.owner,
+                      repo: context.repo.repo,
+                      issue_number: issue.number,
+                      body: warningComment
+                    });
+                    
+                    totalWarned++;
+                    
+                    // Add autoclose label if not present
+                    if (!hasAutocloseLabel) {
+                      await github.rest.issues.addLabels({
+                        owner: context.repo.owner,
+                        repo: context.repo.repo,
+                        issue_number: issue.number,
+                        labels: ['autoclose']
+                      });
+                      totalLabeled++;
+                    }
+                  }
+                } catch (error) {
+                  console.error(`Failed to process issue #${issue.number}: ${error.message}`);
+                }
+              }
+              
+              page++;
+            }
+
+            console.log(`Summary:`);
+            console.log(`- Issues warned (30 days stale): ${totalWarned}`);
+            console.log(`- Issues labeled with autoclose: ${totalLabeled}`);
+            console.log(`- Issues closed (60 days stale): ${totalClosed}`);

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,184 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 2.0.73
+
+- Added clickable `[Image #N]` links that open attached images in the default viewer
+- Added alt-y yank-pop to cycle through kill ring history after ctrl-y yank
+- Added search filtering to the plugin discover screen (type to filter by name, description, or marketplace)
+- Added support for custom session IDs when forking sessions with `--session-id` combined with `--resume` or `--continue` and `--fork-session`
+- Fixed slow input history cycling and race condition that could overwrite text after message submission
+- Improved `/theme` command to open theme picker directly
+- Improved theme picker UI
+- Improved search UX across resume session, permissions, and plugins screens with a unified SearchBox component
+- [VSCode] Added tab icon badges showing pending permissions (blue) and unread completions (orange)
+
+## 2.0.72
+
+- Added Claude in Chrome (Beta) feature that works with the Chrome extension (https://claude.ai/chrome) to let you control your browser directly from Claude Code
+- Reduced terminal flickering
+- Added scannable QR code to mobile app tip for quick app downloads
+- Added loading indicator when resuming conversations for better feedback
+- Fixed `/context` command not respecting custom system prompts in non-interactive mode
+- Fixed order of consecutive Ctrl+K lines when pasting with Ctrl+Y
+- Improved @ mention file suggestion speed (~3x faster in git repositories)
+- Improved file suggestion performance in repos with `.ignore` or `.rgignore` files
+- Improved settings validation errors to be more prominent
+- Changed thinking toggle from Tab to Alt+T to avoid accidental triggers
+
+## 2.0.71
+
+- Added /config toggle to enable/disable prompt suggestions
+- Added `/settings` as an alias for the `/config` command
+- Fixed @ file reference suggestions incorrectly triggering when cursor is in the middle of a path
+- Fixed MCP servers from `.mcp.json` not loading when using `--dangerously-skip-permissions`
+- Fixed permission rules incorrectly rejecting valid bash commands containing shell glob patterns (e.g., `ls *.txt`, `for f in *.png`)
+- Bedrock: Environment variable `ANTHROPIC_BEDROCK_BASE_URL` is now respected for token counting and inference profile listing
+- New syntax highlighting engine for native build
+
+## 2.0.70
+
+- Added Enter key to accept and submit prompt suggestions immediately (tab still accepts for editing)
+- Added wildcard syntax `mcp__server__*` for MCP tool permissions to allow or deny all tools from a server
+- Added auto-update toggle for plugin marketplaces, allowing per-marketplace control over automatic updates
+- Added `current_usage` field to status line input, enabling accurate context window percentage calculations
+- Fixed input being cleared when processing queued commands while the user was typing
+- Fixed prompt suggestions replacing typed input when pressing Tab
+- Fixed diff view not updating when terminal is resized
+- Improved memory usage by 3x for large conversations
+- Improved resolution of stats screenshots copied to clipboard (Ctrl+S) for crisper images
+- Removed # shortcut for quick memory entry (tell Claude to edit your CLAUDE.md instead)
+- Fix thinking mode toggle in /config not persisting correctly
+- Improve UI for file creation permission dialog
+
+## 2.0.69
+
+- Minor bugfixes
+
+## 2.0.68
+
+- Fixed IME (Input Method Editor) support for languages like Chinese, Japanese, and Korean by correctly positioning the composition window at the cursor
+- Fixed a bug where disallowed MCP tools were visible to the model
+- Fixed an issue where steering messages could be lost while a subagent is working
+- Fixed Option+Arrow word navigation treating entire CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) text sequences as a single word instead of navigating by word boundaries
+- Improved plan mode exit UX: show simplified yes/no dialog when exiting with empty or missing plan instead of throwing an error
+- Add support for enterprise managed settings. Contact your Anthropic account team to enable this feature.
+
+## 2.0.67
+
+- Thinking mode is now enabled by default for Opus 4.5
+- Thinking mode configuration has moved to /config
+- Added search functionality to `/permissions` command with `/` keyboard shortcut for filtering rules by tool name
+- Show reason why autoupdater is disabled in `/doctor`
+- Fixed false "Another process is currently updating Claude" error when running `claude update` while another instance is already on the latest version
+- Fixed MCP servers from `.mcp.json` being stuck in pending state when running in non-interactive mode (`-p` flag or piped input)
+- Fixed scroll position resetting after deleting a permission rule in `/permissions`
+- Fixed word deletion (opt+delete) and word navigation (opt+arrow) not working correctly with non-Latin text such as Cyrillic, Greek, Arabic, Hebrew, Thai, and Chinese
+- Fixed `claude install --force` not bypassing stale lock files
+- Fixed consecutive @~/ file references in CLAUDE.md being incorrectly parsed due to markdown strikethrough interference
+- Windows: Fixed plugin MCP servers failing due to colons in log directory paths
+
+## 2.0.65
+
+- Added ability to switch models while writing a prompt using alt+p (linux, windows), option+p (macos).
+- Added context window information to status line input
+- Added `fileSuggestion` setting for custom `@` file search commands
+- Added `CLAUDE_CODE_SHELL` environment variable to override automatic shell detection (useful when login shell differs from actual working shell)
+- Fixed prompt not being saved to history when aborting a query with Escape
+- Fixed Read tool image handling to identify format from bytes instead of file extension
+
+## 2.0.64
+
+- Made auto-compacting instant
+- Agents and bash commands can run asynchronously and send messages to wake up the main agent
+- /stats now provides users with interesting CC stats, such as favorite model, usage graph, usage streak
+- Added named session support: use `/rename` to name sessions, `/resume <name>` in REPL or `claude --resume <name>` from the terminal to resume them
+- Added support for .claude/rules/`.  See https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory for details.
+- Added image dimension metadata when images are resized, enabling accurate coordinate mappings for large images
+- Fixed auto-loading .env when using native installer
+- Fixed `--system-prompt` being ignored when using `--continue` or `--resume` flags
+- Improved `/resume` screen with grouped forked sessions and keyboard shortcuts for preview (P) and rename (R)
+- VSCode: Added copy-to-clipboard button on code blocks and bash tool inputs
+- VSCode: Fixed extension not working on Windows ARM64 by falling back to x64 binary via emulation
+- Bedrock: Improve efficiency of token counting
+- Bedrock: Add support for `aws login` AWS Management Console credentials
+- Unshipped AgentOutputTool and BashOutputTool, in favor of a new unified TaskOutputTool
+
+## 2.0.62
+
+- Added "(Recommended)" indicator for multiple-choice questions, with the recommended option moved to the top of the list
+- Added `attribution` setting to customize commit and PR bylines (deprecates `includeCoAuthoredBy`)
+- Fixed duplicate slash commands appearing when ~/.claude is symlinked to a project directory
+- Fixed slash command selection not working when multiple commands share the same name
+- Fixed an issue where skill files inside symlinked skill directories could become circular symlinks
+- Fixed running versions getting removed because lock file incorrectly going stale
+- Fixed IDE diff tab not closing when rejecting file changes
+
+## 2.0.61
+
+- Reverted VSCode support for multiple terminal clients due to responsiveness issues.
+
+## 2.0.60
+
+- Added background agent support. Agents run in the background while you work
+- Added --disable-slash-commands CLI flag to disable all slash commands
+- Added model name to "Co-Authored-By" commit messages
+- Enabled "/mcp enable [server-name]" or "/mcp disable [server-name]" to quickly toggle all servers
+- Updated Fetch to skip summarization for pre-approved websites
+- VSCode: Added support for multiple terminal clients connecting to the IDE server simultaneously
+
+## 2.0.59
+
+- Added --agent CLI flag to override the agent setting for the current session
+- Added `agent` setting to configure main thread with a specific agent's system prompt, tool restrictions, and model
+- VS Code: Fixed .claude.json config file being read from incorrect location
+
+## 2.0.58
+
+- Pro users now have access to Opus 4.5 as part of their subscription!
+- Fixed timer duration showing "11m 60s" instead of "12m 0s"
+- Windows: Managed settings now prefer `C:\Program Files\ClaudeCode` if it exists. Support for `C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode` will be removed in a future version.
+
+## 2.0.57
+
+- Added feedback input when rejecting plans, allowing users to tell Claude what to change
+- VSCode: Added streaming message support for real-time response display
+
+## 2.0.56
+
+- Added setting to enable/disable terminal progress bar (OSC 9;4)
+- VSCode Extension: Added support for VS Code's secondary sidebar (VS Code 1.97+), allowing Claude Code to be displayed in the right sidebar while keeping the file explorer on the left. Requires setting sidebar as Preferred Location in the config.
+
+## 2.0.55
+
+- Fixed proxy DNS resolution being forced on by default. Now opt-in via `CLAUDE_CODE_PROXY_RESOLVES_HOSTS=true` environment variable
+- Fixed keyboard navigation becoming unresponsive when holding down arrow keys in memory location selector
+- Improved AskUserQuestion tool to auto-submit single-select questions on the last question, eliminating the extra review screen for simple question flows
+- Improved fuzzy matching for `@` file suggestions with faster, more accurate results
+
+## 2.0.54
+
+- Hooks: Enable PermissionRequest hooks to process 'always allow' suggestions and apply permission updates
+- Fix issue with excessive iTerm notifications
+
+## 2.0.52
+
+- Fixed duplicate message display when starting Claude with a command line argument
+- Fixed `/usage` command progress bars to fill up as usage increases (instead of showing remaining percentage)
+- Fixed image pasting not working on Linux systems running Wayland (now falls back to wl-paste when xclip is unavailable)
+- Permit some uses of `$!` in bash commands
+
+## 2.0.51
+
+- Added Opus 4.5! https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-5
+- Introducing Claude Code for Desktop: https://claude.com/download
+- To give you room to try out our new model, we've updated usage limits for Claude Code users. See the Claude Opus 4.5 blog for full details
+- Pro users can now purchase extra usage for access to Opus 4.5 in Claude Code
+- Plan Mode now builds more precise plans and executes more thoroughly
+- Usage limit notifications now easier to understand
+- Switched `/usage` back to "% used"
+- Fixed handling of thinking errors
+- Fixed performance regression
+
 ## 2.0.50
 
 - Fixed bug preventing calling MCP tools that have nested references in their input schemas
@@ -26,7 +205,7 @@
 
 ## 2.0.45
 
-- Add support for Microsoft Foundry! See https://code.claude.com/docs/en/azure-ai-foundry
+- Added support for Microsoft Foundry! See https://code.claude.com/docs/en/azure-ai-foundry
 - Added `PermissionRequest` hook to automatically approve or deny tool permission requests with custom logic
 - Send background tasks to Claude Code on the web by starting a message with `&`
 
@@ -149,7 +328,7 @@
 
 ## 2.0.25
 
-- Removed legacy SDK entrypoint. Please migrate to @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk for future SDK updates: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sdk/migration-guide
+- Removed legacy SDK entrypoint. Please migrate to @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk for future SDK updates: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/agent-sdk/migration-guide
 
 ## 2.0.24
 
@@ -217,7 +396,7 @@
 - Repository-level plugin configuration via `extraKnownMarketplaces` for team collaboration
 - `/plugin validate` command for validating plugin structure and configuration
 - Plugin announcement blog post at https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-code-plugins
-- Plugin documentation available at https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/plugins
+- Plugin documentation available at https://code.claude.com/docs/en/plugins
 - Comprehensive error messages and diagnostics via `/doctor` command
 - Avoid flickering in `/model` selector
 - Improvements to `/help`
@@ -295,7 +474,7 @@
 - Bash permission rules now support output redirections when matching (e.g., `Bash(python:*)` matches `python script.py > output.txt`)
 - Fixed thinking mode triggering on negation phrases like "don't think"
 - Fixed rendering performance degradation during token streaming
-- Added SlashCommand tool, which enables Claude to invoke your slash commands. https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/slash-commands#SlashCommand-tool
+- Added SlashCommand tool, which enables Claude to invoke your slash commands. https://code.claude.com/docs/en/slash-commands#SlashCommand-tool
 - Enhanced BashTool environment snapshot logging
 - Fixed a bug where resuming a conversation in headless mode would sometimes enable thinking unnecessarily
 - Migrated --debug logging to a file, to enable easy tailing & filtering
@@ -425,7 +604,7 @@
 
 ## 1.0.81
 
-- Released output styles, including new built-in educational output styles "Explanatory" and "Learning". Docs: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/output-styles
+- Released output styles, including new built-in educational output styles "Explanatory" and "Learning". Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/output-styles
 - Agents: Fix custom agent loading when agent files are unparsable
 
 ## 1.0.80
@@ -630,7 +809,7 @@
 
 ## 1.0.38
 
-- Released hooks. Special thanks to community input in https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/712. Docs: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/hooks
+- Released hooks. Special thanks to community input in https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/712. Docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/hooks
 
 ## 1.0.37
 

plugins/README.md

@@ -10,50 +10,21 @@ Learn more in the [official plugins documentation](https://docs.claude.com/en/do
 
 ## Plugins in This Directory
 
-### [agent-sdk-dev](./agent-sdk-dev/)
-
-**Claude Agent SDK Development Plugin**
-
-Streamlines the development of Claude Agent SDK applications with scaffolding commands and verification agents.
-
-- **Command**: `/new-sdk-app` - Interactive setup for new Agent SDK projects
-- **Agents**: `agent-sdk-verifier-py` and `agent-sdk-verifier-ts` - Validate SDK applications against best practices
-- **Use case**: Creating and verifying Claude Agent SDK applications in Python or TypeScript
-
-### [commit-commands](./commit-commands/)
-
-**Git Workflow Automation Plugin**
-
-Simplifies common git operations with streamlined commands for committing, pushing, and creating pull requests.
-
-- **Commands**:
-  - `/commit` - Create a git commit with appropriate message
-  - `/commit-push-pr` - Commit, push, and create a PR in one command
-  - `/clean_gone` - Clean up stale local branches marked as [gone]
-- **Use case**: Faster git workflows with less context switching
-
-### [code-review](./code-review/)
-
-**Automated Pull Request Code Review Plugin**
-
-Provides automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring to filter false positives.
-
-- **Command**:
-  - `/code-review` - Automated PR review workflow
-- **Use case**: Automated code review on pull requests with high-confidence issue detection (threshold ≥80)
-
-### [feature-dev](./feature-dev/)
-
-**Comprehensive Feature Development Workflow Plugin**
-
-Provides a structured 7-phase approach to feature development with specialized agents for exploration, architecture, and review.
-
-- **Command**: `/feature-dev` - Guided feature development workflow
-- **Agents**:
-  - `code-explorer` - Deeply analyzes existing codebase features
-  - `code-architect` - Designs feature architectures and implementation blueprints
-  - `code-reviewer` - Reviews code for bugs, quality issues, and project conventions
-- **Use case**: Building new features with systematic codebase understanding and quality assurance
+| Name | Description | Contents |
+|------|-------------|----------|
+| [agent-sdk-dev](./agent-sdk-dev/) | Development kit for working with the Claude Agent SDK | **Command:** `/new-sdk-app` - Interactive setup for new Agent SDK projects<br>**Agents:** `agent-sdk-verifier-py`, `agent-sdk-verifier-ts` - Validate SDK applications against best practices |
+| [claude-opus-4-5-migration](./claude-opus-4-5-migration/) | Migrate code and prompts from Sonnet 4.x and Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5 | **Skill:** `claude-opus-4-5-migration` - Automated migration of model strings, beta headers, and prompt adjustments |
+| [code-review](./code-review/) | Automated PR code review using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring to filter false positives | **Command:** `/code-review` - Automated PR review workflow<br>**Agents:** 5 parallel Sonnet agents for CLAUDE.md compliance, bug detection, historical context, PR history, and code comments |
+| [commit-commands](./commit-commands/) | Git workflow automation for committing, pushing, and creating pull requests | **Commands:** `/commit`, `/commit-push-pr`, `/clean_gone` - Streamlined git operations |
+| [explanatory-output-style](./explanatory-output-style/) | Adds educational insights about implementation choices and codebase patterns (mimics the deprecated Explanatory output style) | **Hook:** SessionStart - Injects educational context at the start of each session |
+| [feature-dev](./feature-dev/) | Comprehensive feature development workflow with a structured 7-phase approach | **Command:** `/feature-dev` - Guided feature development workflow<br>**Agents:** `code-explorer`, `code-architect`, `code-reviewer` - For codebase analysis, architecture design, and quality review |
+| [frontend-design](./frontend-design/) | Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces that avoid generic AI aesthetics | **Skill:** `frontend-design` - Auto-invoked for frontend work, providing guidance on bold design choices, typography, animations, and visual details |
+| [hookify](./hookify/) | Easily create custom hooks to prevent unwanted behaviors by analyzing conversation patterns or explicit instructions | **Commands:** `/hookify`, `/hookify:list`, `/hookify:configure`, `/hookify:help`<br>**Agent:** `conversation-analyzer` - Analyzes conversations for problematic behaviors<br>**Skill:** `writing-rules` - Guidance on hookify rule syntax |
+| [learning-output-style](./learning-output-style/) | Interactive learning mode that requests meaningful code contributions at decision points (mimics the unshipped Learning output style) | **Hook:** SessionStart - Encourages users to write meaningful code (5-10 lines) at decision points while receiving educational insights |
+| [plugin-dev](./plugin-dev/) | Comprehensive toolkit for developing Claude Code plugins with 7 expert skills and AI-assisted creation | **Command:** `/plugin-dev:create-plugin` - 8-phase guided workflow for building plugins<br>**Agents:** `agent-creator`, `plugin-validator`, `skill-reviewer`<br>**Skills:** Hook development, MCP integration, plugin structure, settings, commands, agents, and skill development |
+| [pr-review-toolkit](./pr-review-toolkit/) | Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification | **Command:** `/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr` - Run with optional review aspects (comments, tests, errors, types, code, simplify, all)<br>**Agents:** `comment-analyzer`, `pr-test-analyzer`, `silent-failure-hunter`, `type-design-analyzer`, `code-reviewer`, `code-simplifier` |
+| [ralph-wiggum](./ralph-wiggum/) | Interactive self-referential AI loops for iterative development. Claude works on the same task repeatedly until completion | **Commands:** `/ralph-loop`, `/cancel-ralph` - Start/stop autonomous iteration loops<br>**Hook:** Stop - Intercepts exit attempts to continue iteration |
+| [security-guidance](./security-guidance/) | Security reminder hook that warns about potential security issues when editing files | **Hook:** PreToolUse - Monitors 9 security patterns including command injection, XSS, eval usage, dangerous HTML, pickle deserialization, and os.system calls |
 
 ## Installation
 

plugins/code-review/README.md

@@ -22,23 +22,29 @@ Performs automated code review on a pull request using multiple specialized agen
    - **Agent #4**: Analyze git blame/history for context-based issues
 5. Scores each issue 0-100 for confidence level
 6. Filters out issues below 80 confidence threshold
-7. Posts review comment with high-confidence issues only
+7. Outputs review (to terminal by default, or as PR comment with `--comment` flag)
 
 **Usage:**
 ```bash
-/code-review
+/code-review [--comment]
 ```
 
+**Options:**
+- `--comment`: Post the review as a comment on the pull request (default: outputs to terminal only)
+
 **Example workflow:**
 ```bash
-# On a PR branch, run:
+# On a PR branch, run locally (outputs to terminal):
 /code-review
 
+# Post review as PR comment:
+/code-review --comment
+
 # Claude will:
 # - Launch 4 review agents in parallel
 # - Score each issue for confidence
-# - Post comment with issues ≥80 confidence
-# - Skip posting if no high-confidence issues found
+# - Output issues ≥80 confidence (to terminal or PR depending on flag)
+# - Skip if no high-confidence issues found
 ```
 
 **Features:**
@@ -114,17 +120,23 @@ This plugin is included in the Claude Code repository. The command is automatica
 ### Standard PR review workflow:
 ```bash
 # Create PR with changes
+# Run local review (outputs to terminal)
 /code-review
 
 # Review the automated feedback
 # Make any necessary fixes
+
+# Optionally post as PR comment
+/code-review --comment
+
 # Merge when ready
 ```
 
 ### As part of CI/CD:
 ```bash
 # Trigger on PR creation or update
-# Automatically posts review comments
+# Use --comment flag to post review comments
+/code-review --comment
 # Skip if review already exists
 ```
 

plugins/code-review/commands/code-review.md

@@ -1,89 +1,107 @@
 ---
-allowed-tools: Bash(gh issue view:*), Bash(gh search:*), Bash(gh issue list:*), Bash(gh pr comment:*), Bash(gh pr diff:*), Bash(gh pr view:*), Bash(gh pr list:*)
+allowed-tools: Bash(gh issue view:*), Bash(gh search:*), Bash(gh issue list:*), Bash(gh pr comment:*), Bash(gh pr diff:*), Bash(gh pr view:*), Bash(gh pr list:*), mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment
 description: Code review a pull request
-disable-model-invocation: false
 ---
 
 Provide a code review for the given pull request.
 
 To do this, follow these steps precisely:
 
-1. Use a Haiku agent to check if the pull request (a) is closed, (b) is a draft, (c) does not need a code review (eg. because it is an automated pull request, or is very simple and obviously ok), or (d) already has a code review from you from earlier. If so, do not proceed.
-2. Use another Haiku agent to give you a list of file paths to (but not the contents of) any relevant CLAUDE.md files from the codebase: the root CLAUDE.md file (if one exists), as well as any CLAUDE.md files in the directories whose files the pull request modified
-3. Use a Haiku agent to view the pull request, and ask the agent to return a summary of the change
-4. Then, launch 5 parallel Sonnet agents to independently code review the change. The agents should do the following, then return a list of issues and the reason each issue was flagged (eg. CLAUDE.md adherence, bug, historical git context, etc.):
-   a. Agent #1: Audit the changes to make sure they compily with the CLAUDE.md. Note that CLAUDE.md is guidance for Claude as it writes code, so not all instructions will be applicable during code review.
-   b. Agent #2: Read the file changes in the pull request, then do a shallow scan for obvious bugs. Avoid reading extra context beyond the changes, focusing just on the changes themselves. Focus on large bugs, and avoid small issues and nitpicks. Ignore likely false positives.
-   c. Agent #3: Read the git blame and history of the code modified, to identify any bugs in light of that historical context
-   d. Agent #4: Read previous pull requests that touched these files, and check for any comments on those pull requests that may also apply to the current pull request.
-   e. Agent #5: Read code comments in the modified files, and make sure the changes in the pull request comply with any guidance in the comments.
-5. For each issue found in #4, launch a parallel Haiku agent that takes the PR, issue description, and list of CLAUDE.md files (from step 2), and returns a score to indicate the agent's level of confidence for whether the issue is real or false positive. To do that, the agent should score each issue on a scale from 0-100, indicating its level of confidence. For issues that were flagged due to CLAUDE.md instructions, the agent should double check that the CLAUDE.md actually calls out that issue specifically. The scale is (give this rubric to the agent verbatim):
-   a. 0: Not confident at all. This is a false positive that doesn't stand up to light scrutiny, or is a pre-existing issue.
-   b. 25: Somewhat confident. This might be a real issue, but may also be a false positive. The agent wasn't able to verify that it's a real issue. If the issue is stylistic, it is one that was not explicitly called out in the relevant CLAUDE.md.
-   c. 50: Moderately confident. The agent was able to verify this is a real issue, but it might be a nitpick or not happen very often in practice. Relative to the rest of the PR, it's not very important.
-   d. 75: Highly confident. The agent double checked the issue, and verified that it is very likely it is a real issue that will be hit in practice. The existing approach in the PR is insufficient. The issue is very important and will directly impact the code's functionality, or it is an issue that is directly mentioned in the relevant CLAUDE.md.
-   e. 100: Absolutely certain. The agent double checked the issue, and confirmed that it is definitely a real issue, that will happen frequently in practice. The evidence directly confirms this.
-6. Filter out any issues with a score less than 80. If there are no issues that meet this criteria, do not proceed.
-7. Use a Haiku agent to repeat the eligibility check from #1, to make sure that the pull request is still eligible for code review.
-8. Finally, use the gh bash command to comment back on the pull request with the result. When writing your comment, keep in mind to:
-   a. Keep your output brief
-   b. Avoid emojis
-   c. Link and cite relevant code, files, and URLs
+1. Launch a haiku agent to check if any of the following are true:
+   - The pull request is closed
+   - The pull request is a draft
+   - The pull request does not need code review (e.g. automated PR, trivial change that is obviously correct)
+   - Claude has already commented on this PR (check `gh pr view <PR> --comments` for comments left by claude)
 
-Examples of false positives, for steps 4 and 5:
+   If any condition is true, stop and do not proceed.
+
+Note: Still review Claude generated PR's.
+
+2. Launch a haiku agent to return a list of file paths (not their contents) for all relevant CLAUDE.md files including:
+   - The root CLAUDE.md file, if it exists
+   - Any CLAUDE.md files in directories containing files modified by the pull request
+
+3. Launch a sonnet agent to view the pull request and return a summary of the changes
+
+4. Launch 4 agents in parallel to independently review the changes. Each agent should return the list of issues, where each issue includes a description and the reason it was flagged (e.g. "CLAUDE.md adherence", "bug"). The agents should do the following:
+
+   Agents 1 + 2: CLAUDE.md compliance sonnet agents
+   Audit changes for CLAUDE.md compliance in parallel. Note: When evaluating CLAUDE.md compliance for a file, you should only consider CLAUDE.md files that share a file path with the file or parents.
+
+   Agent 3: Opus bug agent (parallel subagent with agent 4)
+   Scan for obvious bugs. Focus only on the diff itself without reading extra context. Flag only significant bugs; ignore nitpicks and likely false positives. Do not flag issues that you cannot validate without looking at context outside of the git diff.
+
+   Agent 4: Opus bug agent (parallel subagent with agent 3)
+   Look for problems that exist in the introduced code. This could be security issues, incorrect logic, etc. Only look for issues that fall within the changed code.
+
+   **CRITICAL: We only want HIGH SIGNAL issues.** This means:
+   - Objective bugs that will cause incorrect behavior at runtime
+   - Clear, unambiguous CLAUDE.md violations where you can quote the exact rule being broken
+
+   We do NOT want:
+   - Subjective concerns or "suggestions"
+   - Style preferences not explicitly required by CLAUDE.md
+   - Potential issues that "might" be problems
+   - Anything requiring interpretation or judgment calls
+
+   If you are not certain an issue is real, do not flag it. False positives erode trust and waste reviewer time.
+
+   In addition to the above, each subagent should be told the PR title and description. This will help provide context regarding the author's intent.
+
+5. For each issue found in the previous step by agents 3 and 4, launch parallel subagents to validate the issue. These subagents should get the PR title and description along with a description of the issue. The agent's job is to review the issue to validate that the stated issue is truly an issue with high confidence. For example, if an issue such as "variable is not defined" was flagged, the subagent's job would be to validate that is actually true in the code. Another example would be CLAUDE.md issues. The agent should validate that the CLAUDE.md rule that was violated is scoped for this file and is actually violated. Use Opus subagents for bugs and logic issues, and sonnet agents for CLAUDE.md violations.
+
+6. Filter out any issues that were not validated in step 5. This step will give us our list of high signal issues for our review.
+
+7. If issues were found, skip to step 8 to post inline comments directly.
+
+   If NO issues were found, post a summary comment using `gh pr comment` (if `--comment` argument is provided):
+   "No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance."
+
+8. Post inline comments for each issue using `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment`:
+   - `path`: the file path
+   - `line` (and `startLine` for ranges): select the buggy lines so the user sees them
+   - `body`: Brief description of the issue (no "Bug:" prefix). For small fixes (up to 5 lines changed), include a committable suggestion:
+     ```suggestion
+     corrected code here
+     ```
+
+     **Suggestions must be COMPLETE.** If a fix requires additional changes elsewhere (e.g., renaming a variable requires updating all usages), do NOT use a suggestion block. The author should be able to click "Commit suggestion" and have a working fix - no followup work required.
+
+     For larger fixes (6+ lines, structural changes, or changes spanning multiple locations), do NOT use suggestion blocks. Instead:
+     1. Describe what the issue is
+     2. Explain the suggested fix at a high level
+     3. Include a copyable prompt for Claude Code that the user can use to fix the issue, formatted as:
+        ```
+        Fix [file:line]: [brief description of issue and suggested fix]
+        ```
+
+   **IMPORTANT: Only post ONE comment per unique issue. Do not post duplicate comments.**
+
+Use this list when evaluating issues in Steps 4 and 5 (these are false positives, do NOT flag):
 
 - Pre-existing issues
-- Something that looks like a bug but is not actually a bug
-- Pedantic nitpicks that a senior engineer wouldn't call out
-- Issues that a linter, typechecker, or compiler would catch (eg. missing or incorrect imports, type errors, broken tests, formatting issues, pedantic style issues like newlines). No need to run these build steps yourself -- it is safe to assume that they will be run separately as part of CI.
-- General code quality issues (eg. lack of test coverage, general security issues, poor documentation), unless explicitly required in CLAUDE.md
-- Issues that are called out in CLAUDE.md, but explicitly silenced in the code (eg. due to a lint ignore comment)
-- Changes in functionality that are likely intentional or are directly related to the broader change
-- Real issues, but on lines that the user did not modify in their pull request
+- Something that appears to be a bug but is actually correct
+- Pedantic nitpicks that a senior engineer would not flag
+- Issues that a linter will catch (do not run the linter to verify)
+- General code quality concerns (e.g., lack of test coverage, general security issues) unless explicitly required in CLAUDE.md
+- Issues mentioned in CLAUDE.md but explicitly silenced in the code (e.g., via a lint ignore comment)
 
 Notes:
 
-- Do not check build signal or attempt to build or typecheck the app. These will run separately, and are not relevant to your code review.
-- Use `gh` to interact with Github (eg. to fetch a pull request, or to create inline comments), rather than web fetch
-- Make a todo list first
-- You must cite and link each bug (eg. if referring to a CLAUDE.md, you must link it)
-- For your final comment, follow the following format precisely (assuming for this example that you found 3 issues):
+- Use gh CLI to interact with GitHub (e.g., fetch pull requests, create comments). Do not use web fetch.
+- Create a todo list before starting.
+- You must cite and link each issue in inline comments (e.g., if referring to a CLAUDE.md, include a link to it).
+- If no issues are found, post a comment with the following format:
 
 ---
 
-### Code review
-
-Found 3 issues:
-
-1. <brief description of bug> (CLAUDE.md says "<...>")
-
-<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context, note that you MUST provide the full sha and not use bash here, eg. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/1d54823877c4de72b2316a64032a54afc404e619/README.md#L13-L17>
-
-2. <brief description of bug> (some/other/CLAUDE.md says "<...>")
-
-<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context>
-
-3. <brief description of bug> (bug due to <file and code snippet>)
-
-<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context>
-
-🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
-
-<sub>- If this code review was useful, please react with 👍. Otherwise, react with 👎.</sub>
-
----
-
-- Or, if you found no issues:
-
----
-
-### Code review
+## Code review
 
 No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance.
 
-🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
+---
 
-- When linking to code, follow the following format precisely, otherwise the Markdown preview won't render correctly: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-cli-internal/blob/c21d3c10bc8e898b7ac1a2d745bdc9bc4e423afe/package.json#L10-L15
+- When linking to code in inline comments, follow the following format precisely, otherwise the Markdown preview won't render correctly: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/c21d3c10bc8e898b7ac1a2d745bdc9bc4e423afe/package.json#L10-L15
   - Requires full git sha
   - You must provide the full sha. Commands like `https://github.com/owner/repo/blob/$(git rev-parse HEAD)/foo/bar` will not work, since your comment will be directly rendered in Markdown.
   - Repo name must match the repo you're code reviewing